[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash] non-portable amf test?

From: Rob Savoye
Subject: Re: [Gnash] non-portable amf test?
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:24:02 -0600
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070326)

Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:

> The test fail on s390, as it would on all architectures with a
> different endianness than the authors machine.
> Why is the test written like that?  The amfnum_t type is a 64 bit
> integer type, and I would thus expect it to make more sense to just do
> 'if (*num == 0xf03fL)'.  Why isn't it done like that?

  Thanks, I'll fire up my PPC machine and test this. The AMF code is
currently unused right now, but this situation will be changing over the
summer. You obviously caught me me being lazy...

        - rob -

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]