|
| From: | Jean Michel Sellier |
| Subject: | Re: [Gneuralnetwork] Help wanted: a repository for Gneural Network |
| Date: | Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:37:19 +0100 |
Jean,
I would've love to help with it, but it looks like I'm a bit late with the
response as the git repo hosting gneuralnetwork's source code is already up
and running :)
I find it awesome that you've decided to push it right through.
Best,
Kiril
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 12:52:31 EET Jean Michel Sellier wrote:
> Kiril,
>
> I love this "compromise". Many thanks for suggesting it!
>
> At this point, may I ask you to help us with the git repo? You sound like
> you have a lot of experience with it and I would love to have someone like
> you helping me about it! You just need to contact Krisi (in CC) and she
> will add you to the project. I hope this is OK for you. MANY thanks in
> advance!!
>
> JM
>
> P.S. Please, keep me in CC when you do this thing with Kristina so I can
> see how it goes and I can use the repo as soon as possible. Thanks!
>
> 2016-03-23 12:15 GMT+01:00 Kiril Vladimiroff <address@hidden>:
> > Okay, this does make sense. It will be easier for you to experiment until
> > settle down on particular design decisions and features you want for
> > 1.0.0.
> >
> > However, it also does make sense to release the code in a
> > pre-release/alpha/
> > beta/feature-freeze/you-name-it state in order to give an opportunity for
> > the
> > community to review, fix and optimize right before 1.0.0 release. I think
> > this
> > will lead to a more mature and stable first release.
> >
> > How do you feel about such middle ground?
> >
> > On Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:39:16 AM EET Jean Michel Sellier wrote:
> > > Hi Kiril,
> > >
> > > Many thanks for your email. I understand your concern, this is also a
> > > concern of mine. The only reason why there is not a git repository yet
> > > is
> > > because the code is not mature enough for community collaborations. It
> > > is
> > > evolving too rapidly and the best thing to do would be to wait until we
> > > have a stable version (1.0.0, and by stable I mean a code that is not
> >
> > going
> >
> > > to change drastically after that but will be ready for fixes and
> >
> > inclusion
> >
> > > of new methods). More than being helpful, putting the sources on a repo
> >
> > now
> >
> > > would make the community very confused as the code is changing on an
> > > hour
> > > basis..
> > >
> > > In any case, this doesn't stop collaborations since there are already
> >
> > many
> >
> > > of them happening right now but by email (again, only because the code
> > > is
> > > not at its stable version). As soon as Gneural Network will have its
> > > structure very well defined, and therefore ready for community
> >
> > development,
> >
> > > of course there will be a git repository. Hopefully, this will happen in
> > > less than a month. Please, bare in mind that there is A LOT going on
> >
> > right
> >
> > > now behind the scene, it is a lot of work being developed at very rapid
> > > rate and I am doing my best to make it happen quickly. Actually, I can't
> > > wait for you guys to have this first stable version on a git repo!
> > >
> > > Please, don't get me wrong. I am very happy about your comment. It shows
> > > interest from you and this community and this is VERY encouraging and
> > > pushing me to release version 1.0.0 as soon as I can! ;)
> > >
> > > JM
> > >
> > > 2016-03-23 10:18 GMT+01:00 Kiril Vladimiroff <address@hidden>:
> > > > Hi Jean,
> > > >
> > > > I don't see how it would help the development of gneuralnetwork and
> > > > its
> > > > community. There are currently several patches being sent as
> >
> > attachments
> >
> > > > working only under the assumption that the code released in 0.5.0
> >
> > hasn't
> >
> > > > changed since then. So, version controlling tar and gzip files instead
> >
> > of
> >
> > > > source code is not only an obstacle for the community, but for the
> > > > maintainers
> > > > making every next patch harder to apply than the previous one.
> > > >
> > > > Could you elaborate more on why has this decision been taken?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Kiril
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, March 21, 2016 4:43:27 PM EET Jean Michel Sellier wrote:
> > > > > Hi Giuseppe,
> > > > >
> > > > > Many thanks for your comment. The git repository is under
> > > > > development
> > > > > for
> > > > > now. We do not plan to use it until we get to version 1.0.0 of the
> >
> > code.
> >
> > > > It
> > > >
> > > > > will be useful only at that point and, of course, we will release
> > > > > the
> > > > > exploded tarball once the version will be ready.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks again,
> > > > >
> > > > > JM
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-03-21 16:34 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden>:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have checked the git repository and it contains the tarball of
> >
> > the
> >
> > > > > > releases. This is not the way to use git, but the exploded files
> > > > > > should be added. Adding the tarballs makes git quite useless.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Giuseppe
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean Michel Sellier, Ph.D., M.Sc.
> > > > >
> > > > > www.nano-archimedes.com
> > > > >
> > > > > www.gnu.org/software/archimedes
> > > > >
> > > > > www.gnu.org/software/nano-archimedes
> > > > >
> > > > > www.gnu.org/software/gneuralnetwork
> > > > >
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Archimedes
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean Michel Sellier, Ph.D., M.Sc.
> > >
> > > www.nano-archimedes.com
> > >
> > > www.gnu.org/software/archimedes
> > >
> > > www.gnu.org/software/nano-archimedes
> > >
> > > www.gnu.org/software/gneuralnetwork
> > >
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Archimedes
>
> --
> Jean Michel Sellier, Ph.D., M.Sc.
>
> www.nano-archimedes.com
>
> www.gnu.org/software/archimedes
>
> www.gnu.org/software/nano-archimedes
>
> www.gnu.org/software/gneuralnetwork
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Archimedes
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |