[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?
From: |
Brian Brazil |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox? |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:06:45 +0000 |
On 11/6/06, Dave Crossland <address@hidden> wrote:
On 06/11/06, Brian Brazil <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11/6/06, Vim Visual <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I love the idea behind gNewSense... what I don't understand is why you
> > include firefox and not iceweasel if copyleft is that important (and
> > it is).
>
> There are two issues here, and I'd prefer them to be kept seperate.
> The first is if Firefox is non-free? If it is we will, as with any
> other package, etiher change it to be free, or remove it.
It is well documented - eg http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ -
that Firefox included non-free software in the Mozilla builds, though
the sourcecode is freely available.
The reporting thingy (I forget the name, but I know we checked) isn't
in Ubuntu Firefox, and hence not in gNewsense.
Given gNewSense is meant to be FSF-blessed, I'd assume it would prefer
gnuzilla over firefox.
Seperate issue.
> The second is what should our default web browser be (in Gnome anyway).
I recommend IceWeasel because it is compatibly with Firefox
I should have mentioned a third issue: should we include IceWeasel.
Brian
- [gNewSense-users] firefox?, Vim Visual, 2006/11/06
- [gNewSense-users] KDE, Andrew Wigglesworth, 2006/11/06
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, Brian Brazil, 2006/11/06
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, jeff, 2006/11/06
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, Dave Crossland, 2006/11/06
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, Vim Visual, 2006/11/06
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, Karl Goetz, 2006/11/06
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, Vim Visual, 2006/11/07
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, MJ Ray, 2006/11/07
- Re: [gNewSense-users] firefox?, Dave Crossland, 2006/11/07