[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gNewSense-users] Re: Wikipedia

From: Yavor Doganov
Subject: [gNewSense-users] Re: Wikipedia
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:27:18 +0300
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.1 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) (gNewSense GNU/Linux)

At Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:20:45 +0930,
Karl Goetz wrote:
> if you can provide proof that you have a plan for keeping it up to
> date, 

I wonder what would constitute such a proof?  Is there a checklist
somewhere, a quiz or something?  Or the package has to be maintained
for at least X months and used by at least Y users who are supposed to
"vote" for it somehow?  Or perhaps there is a committee that should
decide?  What criteria should be met in order to "provide proof"?

> the relevant patches to builder, 

I see.  I was thinking of a more organized procedure, but I guess it's
too early to discuss it now.

> and that it fits our guidelines (its free software),

This goes without saying.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]