Re: [gNewSense-users] licenses

[Chris Andrew]

Edi,

Thanks for your email.  Can you consider raising bugs for these.  It
is easy to close a bug, and better to do so if you suspect the
software is non-free.  Additionally, I sent a link to the _suspected
non-free_ page.

Many thanks.

Cheers,

Chris.

On 29/08/2007, Edi Granado <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some question about our license policy.
>
> - The FSF think the Artistic License are not free because its to vague. What
> is our opinion about this license?
>
> - The packages tetex-base and tetex-bin including files who are under the
> TeX/MetaFont license wich they are freely modifiable but as long as the
> resulting program is not called TeX or MetaFont. Is this license free?
>
> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/t/tetex-bin/tetex-bin_3.0-27ubuntu1/copyright
> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-15ubuntu1/copyright
>
> - The package tex-common include files that have no license and only are
> copyright.
>
> http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/t/tex-common/tex-common_1.9/copyright
>
>
> Edi
>
> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
>
>