[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gNewSense-users] kernel licence - solved!

From: Luis Alberto
Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] kernel licence - solved!
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:12:15 -0600

Thanks for getting some answers to all the team.
I mailed the author of the section that i took, but with this i think it solves the issue.

As a favor, could some body make a wiki were we can learn to use any of the scrips for the KFV, some packages are really big to make them manually.

Thanks again.

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:47 AM, marco.chieppa-crap <address@hidden> wrote:

i wrote tho the FSF about the non-licenced files in the
kernel. They answer me we can consider that files under the
same licence of the kernel (gpl_v2).

this is their reply:

>Unless you have some reason to believe otherwise, it is
fair to assume
>that files in a project that do not have an explicit
license header have
>the same license as the project itself. So, when you
encounter files in
>the kernel Linux that don't have license headers, you
should treat them
>as if they were released under GPLv2 only.
>If you have further questions, please feel free to contact us.
>Best regards

gNewSense-users mailing list

Luis Alberto Guzmán García
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]