[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gNewSense-users] bug #135
From: |
crap0101 |
Subject: |
[gNewSense-users] bug #135 |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:44:58 +0100 |
Hi!
about the bug 135 http://bugs.gnewsense.org/Bugs/00135 , i wrote the
FSF. Well, they answer me (look down for the mail) and that package
seems not free.
What do you think? we can remove it? if yes, how?
thank,
marco
the FSF answer:
########################################################################
Hi Marco,
"These microcode data are placed under the terms of the
GNU General Public License."
Ok, but the real question is, do they release an actual
human-modifiable source file or is basically just numbers? (A
"binary blob".) I expect the latter. In which case it should
not be in gnewsense regardless of its license.
"We would prefer you not to distribute modified versions
of it and not to ask for assembly or other microcode
source."
Well, that is hardly friendly but since all it says here is
"prefer" I suppose this paragraph is not a killer.
"Copyright (c) 1995-2000 FORE Systems, Inc., as an
unpublished work. This notice does not imply
unrestricted or public access to these materials which
are a trade secret of FORE Systems, Inc. or its
subsidiaries or affiliates (together referred to as
"FORE"), and which may not be reproduced, used, sold or
transferred to any third party without FORE's prior
written consent. All rights reserved."
However, this greatly restrictive notice contradicts the first
statement that it's under the GPL. In such a case, I can't see
how anything definitive can be said about the license -- all we
can say is that it might be free, or it might not be free. In
such a case, it hardly seems like it is a candidate for any free
software distribution.
The paragraph about government rights doesn't help anything
either.
############################################################
- [gNewSense-users] bug #135,
crap0101 <=