[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] gNewSense 1.1 really slow under qemu
From: |
Bruno Miguel |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] gNewSense 1.1 really slow under qemu |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:52:20 +0100 |
No luck compiling qemu. It gives an error in "make install".
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Bruno Miguel
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I have VirtualBox installed, but I find it a bit resources consuming.
> Although I have 1GB of ram, I avoid creating virtual machines in
> VirtualBox with more than 350MB of ram.
>
> I'm compiling qemu right now. Lets see how this goes.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Bake Timmons <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > I dont have qemu accelerator instaled. I'm using a custom kernel and I
> > > instaled qemu from Debian Testing repositories.
> > > I've read qemu docs and saw a tip
> > > (http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-doc.html#SEC48) that says to
> > > add clock=pit to the boot, but no luck. :( The same tip refers to a
> > > 4G/4G patch, but I don't know if it is used in Debians' qemu.
> >
> > If I were you, I would try installing kqemu. It's been a while since I
> > have installed it, but I recall having a better time installing
> > everything from source. I.e., I just installed the latest qemu and
> > kqemu from source and everything went fine. The only caveats I recall
> > were that (1) gcc4 could not be used for either the kernel or for qemu
> > and kqemu and (2) the kernel option REGPARM (or something like that,
> > something to do with using registers for arguments) needed to be OFF.
> >
> > Alternatively, have you considered VirtualBox? I had some success with
> > it also but returned to qemu just because it seemed more
> > community-oriented and open. However, VirtualBox is free software.
> >
>