Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: software render

[Edianer]

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Yavor Doganov <address@hidden> wrote:
> Edianer wrote:
>>
>> Why are by default these packages below installed
>> libgl1-mesa-dri, libgl1-mesa-glx,
>> if the X glx extentsion is removed from gNS?
>> This is a confliction.
>
> You cannot remove packages like that as it breaks the dependency chain
> (i.e. all those other packages that declare some kind of relationship
> Depends/Recommends/Suggests/etc).  The most painless solution is to
> keep the binary packages and remove the non-free contents -- basically
> what has been done.
>
I don't remove it. The libgl1-mesa-swx11 replace the libGL.so library.
This library do the software rendering over OSMesa, not over
libGLcor.so. Is a clean way to solve the GLX problem, otherwise the
libGL.so try to access to libglx.os, libdri.so or libGLcor.so,
libraries. This libraries are in gNS removed, because the Free B, GLX,
public license.

Edianer