[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?
From: |
Bake Timmons |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:05:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
> lack of upgrades between stable releases, which basically makes the
> distro unsuitable for serious use.
>
> What's this part mean?
I don't mean to speak for Yavor, but as an ex-Debian user, I recall
*active* daily updates for Debian (between stable releases)--unlike
the case for Ubuntu, I suppose. If you benefit much from staying on
the cutting edge, then Debian might come out a lot better here. I
think it depends on the kinds of packages that you really use heavily.
For myself, I just periodically update from repositories and install
locally a few packages critical to me.
BTW, for those missing VLC--and I did miss it, too--xine-ui has worked
well for me. Indeed, I recall it playing some stuff better than vlc
(and gxine).
- [gNewSense-users] VLC is non free?, Ivan Ivanov, 2008/08/04
- Re: [gNewSense-users] VLC is non free?, Benjamin Webb, 2008/08/04
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/07
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Ivan Ivanov, 2008/08/07
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/07
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Sean Sieger, 2008/08/08
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?,
Bake Timmons <=
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/09
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Dara Adib, 2008/08/09
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Karl Goetz, 2008/08/09
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Dara Adib, 2008/08/09
- [gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/10
[gNewSense-users] Re: VLC is non free?, Danny Clark, 2008/08/13