[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[gNewSense-users] Re: gen-kernel

From: Robert Millan
Subject: [gNewSense-users] Re: gen-kernel
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:05:27 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

[ Moving this discussion to address@hidden as suggested by Daniel
  Clark on IRC.  Those who were in CC are in BCC now, please request explicitly
  if you want to continue being CCed.  ]

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 06:47:30PM +1030, Karl Goetz wrote:
> >   - Would you like me to send all of it in a big patch, or send them
> > in separately one by one?
> is it just changes to gen-kernel, or builder in general? I know i do
> 'one patch fits all' for my builder changes.

Here's my working version of gen-kernel.  It still needs some polishing,
but is almost finished.

> I'll be interested to see your patch, and how much of our changes to
> Builder will conflict - I have quite a large patch as well.

It would probably be more practical if I split the patch and send an
explanation for each part, also because of the conflicts.

Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

Attachment: gen-kernel.diff
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]