[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gNewSense-users] is Dapper Drake more stable than gNewSense?

From: Karl Goetz
Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] is Dapper Drake more stable than gNewSense?
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:37:21 +1030

On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:18:09 -0400
Patrick DeBoard <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm just wondering, 'cause I've been having fits with gns.  it seems 
> like we gns users are working out the bugs in it, or am I mistaken?
> I did like Ubuntu's simplicity.  It seemed to rarely give me
> problems, too, so i'm wondering if it's better for a non-geek dork
> like myself. Thanks :)

Just FYI, gNS 1.x was based on Dapper. gNS 2.x is based on Hardy. I
could easily believe that Dapper is more stable - its been out for 2
years longer. However, our 1.x is no longer supported by gNS.

Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian user / gNewSense contributor
No, I won't join your social networking group

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]