[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Looking for proof readers for a few Lemote documen
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Looking for proof readers for a few Lemote documents |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:37:05 +1030 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:43:44 +0200
Lars Nooden <address@hidden> wrote:
> Karl Goetz wrote:
>
> > When it no longer needs to be done in secrecy let me know ;) (And if
> > there is real source[1] rather then ODT we can put in revision
> > control[2], so much the better.
> >
> > [1] docbook for example.
> > [2] bzr for example
> > kk
>
> I looked at converting documentation for another project to Docbook.
>
> The roving OOXML scandals seem to have DDOS'd XML developmers,
> including those previously developing Docbook, which is stuck at v4.5
> with 5.0 being stalled. http://www.docbook.org/schemas/
:/ bugger. (I'm only mildly concerned, since 4.5 is quite good, imo)
> ODT can be put in revision control systems. The blob you are used to
> seeing as OD* is a zipped directory of many files. You could have the
> revision control system unzip everything on the way in. You get
> something like this, with various embedded objects getting their own
> files:
The other option is having a structure like this:
<repo head>
- readme
- gen-odf.sh
- <directory with files>
> drwxr-xr-x 10 lars lars 200 2009-11-10 12:41 Configurations2
> drwxr-xr-x 2 lars lars 60 2009-11-10 12:41 META-INF
> drwxr-xr-x 2 lars lars 60 2009-11-10 12:41 Thumbnails
> -rw-r--r-- 1 lars lars 27097 2009-10-12 19:27 content.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 lars lars 62 2009-10-12 19:27 layout-cache
> -rw-r--r-- 1 lars lars 876 2009-10-12 19:27 meta.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 lars lars 39 2009-10-12 19:27 mimetype
> -rw-r--r-- 1 lars lars 8197 2009-10-12 19:27 settings.xml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 lars lars 11240 2009-10-12 19:27 styles.xml
I think the reason for a structure like that is obvious enough:)
> That is one way. I don't know if it is currently practical, but it
> has been theoretically available for ages.
Its ugly, practical or not.
> Another way would be to save as a flat XML file. That will put
> everything, including images, into a single file. The images end up
> like this:
> <draw:z-index="0">
> <draw:image>
> <office:binary-data>iVBORw0KGgoAA...
Just no, please >.>
kk
> /Lars
>
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature