[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gNewSense-users] Parkes Freedom Verification

From: Karl Goetz
Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] Parkes Freedom Verification
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 10:05:07 +1000

On Thu, 26 May 2011 18:57:30 +0100
"Paul O'Malley" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thursday 26 May 2011 18:13:51 Jason Self wrote:
> > I'm running a FOSSology instance [1] to scan the repository and
> > verify that everything is free software.
> > 
> > All of the "A" packages [2] completed this morning, and I've filed
> > the first bug report [3] using the information that FOSSology
> > provided. More are coming as it found several packages with

> > [3]

> Interesting
> Anyone like to contact the debian file packager.

We have a page on filing freedom bugs in the wiki now - might need more
work, but its a start.

> On i386 the file is now GPLed somewhere along the way I am sure a
> conversation too place with:
> Paolo Severini address@hidden

When did this happen? atp was last updated in debian during 2006:

> However the "copyright" file in ~/atp-1.2/debian
> This package was put together from sources obtained at:
> by Hamish Moffatt <address@hidden>
> there are some even more interesting comments in 
> changelog for the same version
> lots of comments and bugs closed 
> my interest here is why does 
> apt-get source on i386 debian differ from mipssel

It doesnt, at least according to the packages page:

Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
No, I won't join your social networking group

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]