[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?)
From: |
Pawel Kot |
Subject: |
Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?) |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:08:25 +0200 |
>>> address@hidden 22 October 2002 10:47:10 >>>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:54:33AM +0200, Pawel Kot wrote:
> > > ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _snprintf
> > > snprintf.o definition of _snprintf in section (__TEXT,__text)
> > > /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(snprintf.So) definition of _snprintf
> > > ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _vsnprintf
> > > snprintf.o definition of _vsnprintf in section (__TEXT,__text)
> > > /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(vsnprintf.So) definition of _vsnprintf
> >
> > And this is the weirdness. It should be detected by the configure.
Don't
> > you use configure?
>
> If the system provided snprintf isn't perfect gnokii will use it's
own
> implementation.
So let's use gn_snprintf instead of snprintf. Let's make
#define gn_snprintf snprintf
in case when the sprintf is good and own implementation in the other
case.
Does it make sense? We'll avoid above problems in this approach.
pkot
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), (continued)
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Pawel Kot, 2002/10/22
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), BORBELY Zoltan, 2002/10/22
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Ruotger . Skupin, 2002/10/22
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Pawel Kot, 2002/10/22
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Ruotger . Skupin, 2002/10/23
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Pawel Kot, 2002/10/23
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Pawel Kot, 2002/10/23
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), BORBELY Zoltan, 2002/10/23
- Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Pawel Kot, 2002/10/23
Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?), Joshua Clements, 2002/10/21
Re: Mac OS X 10.2.1 - 6310i !(?),
Pawel Kot <=