[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?
From: |
Zrubecz Laszlo |
Subject: |
Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug? |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:11:03 +0200 |
2005-06-21, Pawel Kot wrote:
> They are supported. You need to use the following syntax:
> TEL;VOICE:...
> TEL;HOME:...
> TEL:CELL:...
> TEL:FAX:...
> TEL:WORK:...
> TEL:PREF:...
> EMAIL:INTERNET:...
> etc.
Jes, it's OK, but it isn't vcard v3.0 format...
> And gnokii doesn't support evolution format at the moment.
OK, no more question about it... :)
> > It's ok, that the conversion can be buggy, but what can't? What if we
> > can force the conversion with an option? I think the inport feature is
> > useless witout the phone specific conversions.
>
> Please make a suggestion how we should implement it.
Well, I know nothing about the gnokii source. Mainly because I have not
had any C programming practice... So I'm doing this substitution in
perl: s/[^0-9+*#]//g
--
Zrubi.
- phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Zrubecz Laszlo, 2005/06/20
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Pawel Kot, 2005/06/20
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Zrubecz Laszlo, 2005/06/21
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Pawel Kot, 2005/06/21
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?,
Zrubecz Laszlo <=
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Pawel Kot, 2005/06/21
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Zrubecz Laszlo, 2005/06/21
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Zrubecz Laszlo, 2005/06/22
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Balint Reczey, 2005/06/22
- Re: phone number and/or vcard handling bug?, Pawel Kot, 2005/06/22