Re: xpm images and packaging policy

[Andrew \"ruskie\" Levstik]

Pawel Kot wrote :

> Hi,
> 
> 2005/12/30, Linus Walleij <address@hidden>:
> > any progress? I think the best thing for us might be to go for a patched
> > source .tar with xgnokii removed... simple and solves the problem.
> > Currently we have a 3rd party repository (livna) hosting gnokii but moving
> > most of it into Fedora Extras and leaving just xgnokii on livna is quite
> > OK.
> 
> Sorry I forgot to answer. Hugh and I think that to avoid too much mess
> we'll do the following:
>  - leave in CVS things as they are
>  - script to prepare the release tarball will exclude xpm with phone
> pictures leaving just a default one and prepare the additional XPM
> package
> We'll start with 0.6.11 with that policy if there will be no veto.
> 
> I hope that would be fine. Can any other distro packages express
> his/her opinion on that?
> 
> take care,
> pkot
> --
> Pawel Kot
> http://www.gnokii.org/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnokii-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnokii-users
> 
> 

Would work for us(Source Mage)

-- 
Andrew "ruskie" Levstik
Source Mage GNU/Linux Games grimoire guru
Geek/Hacker/Tinker

Hacker FAQ: http://www.plethora.net/%7eseebs/faqs/hacker.html

Key id = 9A5117F8
Key fingerprint = 6731 FEF2 99A8 4672 5962  69AB 3DAF DA67 9A51 17F8