[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II
From: |
Pawel Kot |
Subject: |
Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:22:12 +0200 |
Hi,
On 10/6/06, Daniele Forsi <address@hidden> wrote:
Pawel Kot wrote:
> Please see the following patch (hope gmail doesn't mangle it).
long lines were wrapped (in my patch too) and it seems you can't configure
gmail to not do it
I thought that mail programs did not change tabs to spaces (patch -l to get
around this), better use attachments next time
Or send it from another mailing program. I prefer inlined patches as I
can comment them "live".
>+ sprintf(req, "AT+CPMS=\"%s\"\r", memorynames[mt]);
> ret = sm_message_send(23, GN_OP_Init, req, state);
we need to change number of bytes to send from 23 to 13
Good point. I haven't tested the patch.
> - data->sms_status->new_message_store = GN_MT_ME;
> - data->sms_status->new_message_store = i;
struct member new_message_store was used only here so it can
be deleted from ./include/gnokii/sms.h
typedef struct {
[...]
/* Message store used for new received messages (this is used
* internally by AT_SetSMSMemoryType() in common/phones/atgen.c). */
gn_memory_type new_message_store;
} gn_sms_status;
Yes. I wanted to do this when it turns out that our new way works.
take care,
pkot
--
Pawel Kot
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, (continued)
- RE: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Romain Parmantier - Mobile Devices, 2006/10/05
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Daniele Forsi, 2006/10/05
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Pawel Kot, 2006/10/05
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Pawel Kot, 2006/10/05
- RE: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Romain Parmantier - Mobile Devices, 2006/10/06
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Pawel Kot, 2006/10/06
- RE: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Romain Parmantier - Mobile Devices, 2006/10/09
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Pawel Kot, 2006/10/09
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II, Daniele Forsi, 2006/10/06
- Re: smsd problem with AT model - Part II,
Pawel Kot <=