[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat
From: |
Pawel Kot |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Nov 2007 16:23:39 +0100 |
Hi,
On Nov 7, 2007 2:42 PM, Ian Collier <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:26:40PM +0100, Pawel Kot wrote:
> > Maybe somebody could tell me if there is a difference between:
> > snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s", some_string);
> > and
> > strncpy(buf, some_string, sizeof(buf));
> > buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = 0;
>
> strncpy always fills the whole buffer (it pads shorter strings with
> nul bytes) and so is potentially slightly slower, although of course
> snprintf has the overhead of interpreting the format string.
Yeah. You are probably right. Thanks for the answer.
take care,
pkot
--
Pawel Kot
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Pawel Kot, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Daniele Forsi, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Pawel Kot, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Bastien Nocera, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Pawel Kot, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Bastien Nocera, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Pawel Kot, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Philip Kendall, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Pawel Kot, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Ian Collier, 2007/11/07
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat,
Pawel Kot <=
- Re: [PATCH] Kill strcpy and strcat, Pawel Kot, 2007/11/07