[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800
From: |
Pawel Kot |
Subject: |
Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800 |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:36:26 +0200 |
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:04, Vieri<address@hidden> wrote:
> I see, but shouldn't gnokii wait for the full response to an AT command
> before sending the next one?
In theory it should. But in order not to lock up, it should wait until
given timeout and I think it is the way it does. Obviously it is not
enough for ATZ.
> It seems that gnokii is reading the reply in two steps:
No.
> read : [ATZ<cr><cr><lf>> ]
This is the reply for the previous command.
> write: [ATE1<cr>]
> read : [ERROR<cr><lf>]
> The first "read" should have been:
> read : [ATZ<cr><cr><lf>ERROR<cr><lf>]
Should have been if the ERROR message was issued within given timeout
for ATZ command.
> Or is it that the device is "breaking up" the reply? But still, shouldn't
> gnokii "validate" the responses before proceeding with the next AT command?
It does. But apparently we ignore errors for ATE1 command. It is not
that important.
take care,
--
Pawel Kot
- gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800, Vieri, 2009/07/01
- Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800, Vieri, 2009/07/01
- Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800, Vieri, 2009/07/01
- Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800, Vieri, 2009/07/01
- Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800,
Pawel Kot <=
- Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800, Vieri, 2009/07/01
- Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800, Vieri, 2009/07/01
- Re: gnokii and Nokia Card Phone RPM-3 GSM900/1800, Vieri, 2009/07/01