[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Beautify usage messages
From: |
carstengrohmann |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Beautify usage messages |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:28:14 +0200 |
> > the attached patch prettifies some usage messages by a common schema for
> > option arguments. It changes "option argument" to "<option argument>".
>
> what's the name of this schema?
> isn't it ambiguos to use < and > which have another meaning in the shell?
Changing the schema of options and arguments doesn't have any effect to the
shell, because the usage message will be shown only and won't interpreted by
any shell.
I did some research into standards / guidelines for usage messages and found
two documents:
- Metasyntax (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metasyntax)
- Posix "Utility Argument Syntax"
(http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap12.html)
The current syntax (not the discussed patch) is Posix compliant. The style with
angle brackets are more like GNU.
Please ignore the patch
Regards,
Carsten
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
- Re: [PATCH] Beautify usage messages,
carstengrohmann <=