[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to mungin
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to munging ...) |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:21:33 -0700 (PDT) |
>From the "what it might look like" department:
> From: MJ Ray <address@hidden>
> On 2003-08-20 15:18:37 +0100 Robert Anderson
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I'll repeat for the Nth time: there is _no way_ in my mailer under the
> > current setup to reply to the _list only_.
> And I'll repeat for the Nth time: it is a known bug in your mailer
> acknowledged by the developers.
Right _there_ is the interesting thing.
If Bob was using a well-designed system, instead of going through
the quintuple indirection of:
known bug
-> developers know about it
-> eventually it will be fixed
-> eventually the fix will show up in the distro
-> eventually you'll upgrade
by now somebody would have said something like:
here, put this in .emacs-inits/mail-mode/reply-to-list.scm:
(define (list-reply-icon channel)
(show channel
(stroke
(compose (generic-reply-icon)
(translate 100 100
(string->glyppath (icon-font) "List"))
...))))
(define-command (reply-to-list message-buffer)
(interactive (list (current-message-buffer))
:toolbar-icon list-reply-icon
:toolbar-rank 50)
.... 10 lines of code ommitted ...)
(define-key mail-reader-bindings [M-l] 'reply-to-list)
(define-key mail-reader-bindings [menu Reply "To List"] 'reply-to-list)
or even just:
There's a "reply-to-list" command you can pick up by pointing
your extension-manager at:
address@hidden/mail-mode--reply-to-list--1.0
Supposedly this is scheduled to make it into some future release.
(My public key and other info is at
savannah.gnu.org/gnu-hackers/miles. There's a commerce
page for my emacs hacks at
savannah.gnu.org/bazaar/miles/emacs-hacks in case you
want to subscribe to the project.)
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Specifying protocols [was: the dangers of no reply-to munging], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Federico Di Gregorio, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to munging ...),
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Tom Lord, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Robert Collins, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25