[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2 |
Date: |
17 Oct 2003 11:34:01 +0900 |
Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
> > I think this is a good direction but it needs to cook more, along with
> > the patch tracker foo.
>
> Do you have any specifics?
> For example, would you accept patches to implement "submit-merge" in my
> proposed form? I think that actually the idea of submitting a merge
> request is a fairly general one, and other types of arch process
> management software could leverage the same architecture (dropping a
> file into a queue or sending a GPG-signed email).
If `submit-merge' is just the 2 lines of shell you mentioned, why would
you put it into tla? I'm not sure I see the point of doing so...
-Miles
--
Would you like fries with that?
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bugs-closing (was: tla-pqm 0.2), zander, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16