[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air |
Date: |
14 Nov 2003 16:38:37 +0900 |
David Brown <address@hidden> writes:
> I've sure seen complaints about people not being able to use BK and
> asking for something. CVS was probably chosen because it is 'standard'
> and exists, but the demand is definitely influenced by people not
> wanting, or not able to use BK.
I think another factor was that LM considers CVS `safe', as it's crappy
enough to not really be much of a threat to BK saleswise. For this
reason, it seems unlikely he'd make an arch gateway, even if the benefit
to users was very high.
-Miles
--
"Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill,
where four map sheets join." -- Anon. British Officer in WW I
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Jan Harkes, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Thomas Zander, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, David Brown, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Tom Lord, 2003/11/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Tupshin Harper, 2003/11/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Bruce Stephens, 2003/11/14
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air, Florian Weimer, 2003/11/13