[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Pika Scheme project announcement
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Pika Scheme project announcement |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:18:38 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Clark McGrew <address@hidden>
> This sounds a lot like the direction you were originally taking
> GUILE.
It is, in some sense, a "Guile correctional".
> Is this intended to be included in existing applications as an
> extension language?
Yes.
> If so, are the possible hooks for optional conservative GC
> marking based on the C stack and heap?
Yes (key word _possible_), but the design is such that mostly you
won't feel like reaching for them, hence it is not a priority to
implement them. To put it vaguely, there's a firmer "firewall"
between Pika and an application in which it is embedded than Guile
had.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Pika Scheme project announcement, Tom Lord, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Pika Scheme project announcement, Clark McGrew, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Pika Scheme project announcement,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Pika Scheme project announcement, Miles Bader, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Pika Scheme project announcement, Magnus Therning, 2003/11/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Pika Scheme project announcement, Miles Bader, 2003/11/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Pika Scheme project announcement, Miles Bader, 2003/11/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Pika Scheme project announcement, Bruce Stephens, 2003/11/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Pika Scheme project announcement, Jan Hudec, 2003/11/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Pika Scheme project announcement, Dustin Sallings, 2003/11/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Pika Scheme project announcement, Miles Bader, 2003/11/21