[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1?
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how important is declaring 1.1? |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:11:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Tom Lord wrote:
> One of the main reasons to maybe make the 1.1 release now is the
> debian release process. There have been a number of incidental
> comments on #irc that naming a release 1.1 will cause it to show up in
> debian-stable sooner, which apparently there is some demand for.
ITYM unstable. This is just the package maintainer's decision; there is
nothing in Debian's rules which would prevent him from shipping a
devo--1.1 version.
I'm pretty agnostic about the 1.1 label, but unless the tutorial is
up-to-date, I don't think it would be a good idea from a PR point of
view.
> Any objections? Factual corrections about the debian process?
The documentation question is not relevant for Debian at this point.