[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:06:59 +1100 |
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 08:59, Tom Lord wrote:
> Really I have no objection to working it back in later. It just isn't
> needed to have useful functionality and I'm not clear about why it
> would be important. What "cute things" do you have in mind?
The ones I described mainly: dynamically resigning an archive as you
mirror it - perhaps to sign unsigned archives, or to note that a given
maintainer is listed as having checked all the code.
> One problem with it is that it violates a current abstraction barrier:
> ...
> If we decide to add special push-mirror handling of signatures --
> we'll have to think carefully about how to do it cleanly.
Ok.
> > (Oh, archive-fs.c is -just about- dead here
> > (address@hidden/tla--gpg--1.1)
>
> Wow, that's good news!
patch-2 is committed, mirrored and passes make test. Thats not to say
that it's gold... but if you'd like to mirror and play....
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Tom Lord, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Karel Gardas, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, David Brown, 2003/12/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] crypto signing take 2, Joshua Haberman, 2003/12/08