[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 07:40:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Miles Bader wrote:
> Florian Weimer <address@hidden> writes:
> > Result: Pristine tree is created, revision library is still empty.
> > Is this the expected behavior?
>
> I think it will only use the library automatically if it's marked
> `greedy', so do something like:
>
> tla library-config --greedy ~/revisions
Sorry, doesn't make a difference.
- [Gnu-arch-users] Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?,
Florian Weimer <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Benjamin Bytheway, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Robin Farine, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Florian Weimer, 2003/12/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Pau Aliagas, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Are pristine trees really dead?, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17