[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:58:35 -0500 |
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 08:30, Rob Kaper wrote:
> With detached signatures you could avoid all this, because the original file
> is untouched - you would just sign the .gz and wouldn't even have to make
> md5sums anymore.
Nah...there's two files, the log and the patches.tar.gz. It's cleaner
to have a checksum file and just sign that, instead of having two
signatures.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Tom Lord, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Colin Walters, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Tom Lord, 2004/01/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Colin Walters, 2004/01/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Brian May, 2004/01/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Tom Lord, 2004/01/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Rob Kaper, 2004/01/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE,
Colin Walters <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Tom Lord, 2004/01/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Robert Collins, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Robert Collins, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Johannes Berg, 2004/01/24
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/01/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (fairly minor) SECURITY ISSUE, Geert Stappers, 2004/01/20