[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:17:57 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: David Allouche <address@hidden>
> > Replay: Replay VERSION is sometimes used as a faster 'update', but is
> > actually a lower-level command. However, there's very little sense in
> > applying a continuation (e.g. tag) revision to a tree containing a
> > namespace-previous revision. Therefore, replay VERSION shall apply
only
> > simple revisions, and stop processing at the first non-simple revision
> > it encounters, unless passed the new "--frankenstein" option. Replay
> > REVISION shall have no such safeguards.
[....]
> The --frankenstein option is useless.
No, it isn't. It's so not useless that the join-branch command is
just a syntactic shorthand for one special case of it.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Tom Lord, 2004/06/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Tom Lord, 2004/06/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Bug Goo, 2004/06/16