[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to")
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to") |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 20:50:43 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Colin Walters <address@hidden>
> Of course, we would have to examine detailed (preferably real-world)
> problem descriptions and attempt to evaluate what a specific solution
> would look like. This is what we should have been doing from the first,
> instead of deciding that a VM is needed and then looking for nails to
> hit with it...
I would think you'd like having an excuse to make progress on
"librifying" arch even if the excuse only indirectly relates to
what you'd want to do with a libarch but....
In case you haven't noticed, the need for scripting in arch is very
well established at this point and, indeed, multiple frameworks have
emerged to answer that need. The nails abound.
So why furth and not, say, Python? How much time have you got?
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Magnus Therning, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Jan Hudec, 2004/07/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Colin Walters, 2004/07/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/07/06
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/07/06