[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement)
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement) |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:34:13 -0400 |
>
> > From: address@hidden (James Blackwell)
>
> > If you have bug fixes, minor features, and other otherwise "safe" stuff,
> > then tag off of me. I have a ~ 1 month cycle: 2 weeks for merges, 2+
> > weeks for code freeze. If a bug is found in an rc, then a new rc is
> > shipped, and the freeze clock restarts.
>
Tom Lord wrote:
> I'm glad you mentioned that on-list --- I forgot to.
Grin. I've mentioned it a couple times on list, but after the apparent
nobody but jblack tested rc1 problem, I figured repeating things
ad-frigging-infintum would make more sense. :)
>
> I think that that regularity is a huge, huge win and is one of the
> more important aspects of the shift in project process that's taking
> place.
>
>
> > If you are doing changes to furth, xl-whatever, etc, then tag off of -t
> > and send patches that way.
>
> There should not be any sending of patches in particular directions!
>
> *ALL* patches should go through BugGoo. You, jblack, should be
> working off of buggoo.
I'm not using it directly, though I did hit some of the merge requests
for the last cycle.
Regarding closing bugs, I'm utterly clueless. ;)
> Now, sure... if there's a neglected patch in buggoo and you want to
> ping somebody, then Jblack's directions make sense (and hopefully that
> is more like what he meant).
That's a good call.
> Jblack: I'd be in favor of a PQM-ish policy that *all* changes must
> have an associated buggoo issue which includes a merge request for the
> changes. Would you be willing to require that?
I figured it would be best to wait for the real PQM to come around; in
the mean time, I'm more than happy to scrape off the mergelist and
respond to friendly emails.
> > command deltions/archive incompatible changes are in limbo right now. If
> > furth comes along "soon", then send those to Tom. If furth takes "a long
> > time", then I'll open up a 1.3 development window, and we'll lump all of
> > those patches together, and do a 1.3rc1.
>
> I appreciate your conservatism in such matters.
>
> The voting system would be a win here. Really, there should be a list
> of "topics" and if a proposed change here overlaps with one of those
> topics (e.g., an archive format change) then it should get a "Flag"
> vote which blocks it from integration without
> more-serious-than-average review.
I'm excited about the voting system.
--
James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more! each person you meet a compliment!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), James Blackwell, 2004/08/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Miles Bader, 2004/08/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Miles Bader, 2004/08/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), James Blackwell, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), James Blackwell, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement),
James Blackwell <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Miles Bader, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Marc Recht, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Marc Recht, 2004/08/16