[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Apr 2005 06:16:18 +1000 |
On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 13:04 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> David Allouche wrote:
>
> > And I remembered the previous discussions on associating an inventory ID
> > to the tree-root. The tree-root used to be a bit special, but it's
> > actually a problem to the changeset logic.
>
> In fact, the tree-root does have an id in the changeset logic. It's
> always "?_.", but never appears anywhere else.
Thats the hard coded fall-back default. tree roots can have ids -
trivially try:
init-tree
add .
id .
We should probably make init-tree perform 'add .' on the fly.
Cheers,
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Robert Collins, 2005/04/03
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, David Allouche, 2005/04/03
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/03
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/04
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, David Allouche, 2005/04/05
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/05
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, David Allouche, 2005/04/06
- Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] new documentation progress, Aaron Bentley, 2005/04/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] BitKeeper drops gratis product, support for Linux kernel development, Andy Tai, 2005/04/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: BitKeeper drops gratis product, support for Linux kernel development, Catalin Marinas, 2005/04/06