[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace |
Date: |
Wed, 25 May 2005 08:39:31 -0700 (PDT) |
From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>
Tom Lord wrote:
> Sorry if I was unclear. I think the `<user-name>' should be pretty
> free-form (unlike Arch 1.x) and the `<checksum>' part is so that if
> two users happen to choose the same `<user-name>', at least a "fully
> qualified" version of that commit name (one that includes the
> checksum) will presumably disambiguate.
So by '<user-name>', you mean something like
'address@hidden/tla--devo--2.0--patch-5', not 'tlord' or 'address@hidden',
right? (And then we can relax the restrictions on the non-checksum part.)
Right. It's a user's name for a revision, not the user's own name.
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, John A Meinel, 2005/05/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Tom Lord, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Jason McCarty, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Tom Lord, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Anselm Lingnau, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Tom Lord, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Tom Lord, 2005/05/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Tom Lord, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace, Aaron Bentley, 2005/05/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch revision namespace,
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: baz, --full option, revision lists: What's the best behavior?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/05/25