[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ..
From: |
Jan Hudec |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:55:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.10i |
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 14:55:50 +0200, Aldrik KLEBER wrote:
> > Also, I often end up making a mess of my repository and would like
> > to be able to commit revisions by cherry-picking changes/hunks.
> > darcs does this very nicely.
> >
> tla and baz too, this is a natural way of working.
> In my case I use to make a snapshot branch wich contain only the revisions I
> want and not the others.
>
> baz branch dev-branch--0.1--patch-5 snap-branch--0.1
> baz branch dev-branch--0.1--patch-8 snap-branch--0.1
> baz branch dev-branch--0.1--patch-35 snap-branch--0.1
>
> and next snap-branch contains revisions 5, 8, 35
That's all good and well, but it relies on revisions on dev-branch being
clean.
> > So if I made two changes to a file, I can commit once and select
> > only the first hunk, then commit again and let it write the second
> > hunk to the archive.
> you can commit
> _ the full tree : baz commit
> _ a set of file: baz commit file1 file2 file3
> or baz commit --file-list list_of_file_to_commit.txt
> _ just a file : baz commit file1
But that's not a *HUNK* granularity. *HUNK* granularity means being able to
commit just a *part* of single file -- bazaar, nor most other version control
systems just are not there.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan 'Bulb' Hudec
<address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, jblack, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Jan Hudec, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/08/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Martin Langhoff, 2005/08/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, John A Meinel, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, John A Meinel, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Aaron Bentley, 2005/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?,
Jan Hudec <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu MOY, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, jblack, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Matthieu Moy, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, jblack, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, John A Meinel, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, Anand Kumria, 2005/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, jblack, 2005/08/23
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?, martin f krafft, 2005/08/23