[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL |
Date: |
Fri, 12 May 2006 00:32:33 +0200 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>
> > You may NOT replace the MIT license with the LGPL.
>
> Hm. I'm confused. The MIT license
> (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php) on the one
> hand says you may "sublicense" (re-license?) the code,
>
> Re-license means changing the license. Sub-license means adding one
> or more licenses.
It means adding one or more (sub)licenseEs. I.e. another sublicense
contract between a sublicensor and another (sub)licensee. And under
the MIT terms.
> You can sub-license a MIT licensed work under the
> GPL.
You can not.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Message not available
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, jmg3000, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/05/12
- Re: relicensing from MIT to LGPL, jmg3000, 2006/05/12