Re: Hey Terekhov: Wallace lost. Who'd guess.... ;)

[Alexander Terekhov]

David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> >> But licenses are bound to particular physical copies.  This is the
> >
> > The GPL license is "bound" to intangible WORK, not "particular
> > physical copies". Stupid.
> 
> Oh, back against the wall so soon again?  I am afraid you are wrong
> here.  If you weren't, there could be no such thing as relicensing an
> identical work under different conditions.  

It's many-to-one "bound", retard. One can offer different licenses 
with different terms for the same intangible work. It has really 
nothing to do with your idiotic claim that (IP) "licenses are bound 
to particular physical copies". 

regards,
alexander.