[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: license question with non-GPL library
From: |
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra |
Subject: |
Re: license question with non-GPL library |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 07:54:24 +0100 |
Qua, 2006-08-16 às 08:01 +0200, Merijn de Weerd escreveu:
> Distributors of GPL code are required to make available the full
> source code of all modules, which would include the library.
Please bear in mind that the GNU GPL makes no such requirement "as
such". The GNU GPL requires you to do that when you distribute copies of
the program.
Rui
signature.asc
Description: Esta é uma parte de mensagem assinada digitalmente
- license question with non-GPL library, Scott, 2006/08/15
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <=
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, David Kastrup, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Merijn de Weerd, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16
- Re: license question with non-GPL library, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/08/16