[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Tue, 22 May 2007 15:12:54 +0200 |
none Byron Jeff wrote:
[...]
> >How is there the infringement when the GPL part is still distributed
> >under the GPL?
>
> Asked and answered. Your code does not function without the GPL code in
> this scenario. Therefore it's a derivative of the GPL code. So your code
> must also be distributed under the GPL.
GNU urban legend 101.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/22
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/24
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/24