[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU License, Again
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: GNU License, Again |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2007 15:10:10 +0200 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> put forward by typical case law, is shere lunacy. It is to the best
> interest of the FSF to claim the full extent of this lunacy for their
> interpretation of copyright law and the GPL.
I have yet to see *any* references to case law by GNUtians to back
their utterly lunatic interpretation of copyright law and the GPL.
regards,
alexander.
- Re: GNU License, Again, (continued)
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/29
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, none, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/25
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, mike3, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, John Hasler, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, David Kastrup, 2007/05/26
- Message not available
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26
- Re: GNU License, Again, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/05/26