[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?
From: |
graeme |
Subject: |
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun? |
Date: |
28 Jul 2007 12:29:32 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.131 (Ghosts: First Variation) |
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:27:09 +0000, Tim Smith wrote:
> On 2007-07-27, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>>> It's still managed by people from Sun, and they contribute most of the
>>> code.
>>
>> More to the point:
>>
>> http://contributing.openoffice.org/programming.html
>
> Yup. It's interesting how many self-proclaimed open source advocates
> don't seem to actually know anything about what they advocate, other
> than that it isn't Microsoft and it isn't Apple.
Not new. Copyright transfers of GPL code have been around for a while,
eg to the FSF for the GNU/Hurd project (not the best example).
- Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, plenty560, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, anon, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Jeremy Fisher, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, spike1, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Roy Schestowitz, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?,
graeme <=
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Hadron, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/28