Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 "Updated License Exception"

[Alan Mackenzie]

Hyman Rosen <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote:
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
>> I personally believe that even if a particular instance of object code
>> is judged to include protected expression of both/either source code's
>> copyright owner and/or compiler's copyright owner, the resulting binary
>> is merely an aggregation of multiple computer program works -- in
>> GNUspeak it is called "mere aggregation".
 
>> Do you agree, Hyman?

> Yes.

That is, indeed, the best answer.  ;-)

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).