Re: More FSF hypocrisy

[Rjack]

Hyman Rosen wrote:
> Rjack wrote:
> > There goooooooooooooooooooooooes the goalposts. Claiming that a
> >  contractual COVENANT is a CONDITION will get you nowhere on
> > Usenet or in court:
>
> No, it succeeds in court: 
> <http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf> The clear
> language of the Artistic License creates conditions to protect
> the economic rights at issue in the granting of a public license.
> These conditions govern the rights to modify and distribute the
> computer programs and files included in the downloadable software
>  package. ... Having determined that the terms of the Artistic
> License are enforceable copyright conditions, we remand

There weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeent the goalposts.

Having determined that the GPL is the Artistic License isn't just
moooooooooooooooving the goalposts, it's cuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuutting
them down.