|
From: | Rjack |
Subject: | Re: The GPL means what you want it to mean |
Date: | Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:09:44 -0400 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) |
Rahul Dhesi wrote:
"amicus_curious" <ACDC@sti.net> writes:A very major difference is that judges were ruling against Wallace and that has not yet happened to Rjack.Is there any significant difference between Rjack and Wallace? --Ah yes! I had forgotten that Rjack has overruled the CAFC (repeatedly). I appreciate the correction.
Courts disagree with other courts all the time. Constant disagreement among the Appellate Circuits is a major reason for a grant of certiorari by the Supreme Court. Present a rational, logical argument supported by legal authority and have at it. There is nothing intrinsically wrong with disagreeing with a court when relying on alternate but conflicting legal authority. Present your legal arguments and have at it. Using ad homonem arguments because your angry with someone will convince no one. Sincerely, Rjack :)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |