[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:32:41 +0200 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > When a transaction results in an individual being entitled
> > to perpetual possession of the copy
>
> Because it does not suit your incorrect theories,
Man oh man, to doctor, to doctor you should go, Hyman.
http://www.dfc.org/dfc1/Active_Issues/graphic/first_sale.html
"as conceded by Time Warner, digital transmissions can result in the
fixation of a tangible copy.1 By intentionally engaging in digital
transmissions with the
awareness that a tangible copy is made on the recipients computer,
copyright owners are indeed transferring ownership of a copy of the work
to lawful recipients."
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, (continued)
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/13
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/13
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, David Kastrup, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, amicus_curious, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Rjack, 2009/10/14
- Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Hyman Rosen, 2009/10/14
Re: US court says software is owned, not licensed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/10/13