Re: SFLC is SOL

[David Kastrup]

RJack <user@example.net> writes:

> Hence defendant Versa's Answer:
>
> ======================================================================
>                   FIFTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
>        (ILLEGAL, UNCONSCIONABLE AND CONTRARY TO PUBLIC POLICY)
>
> On information and belief, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claims are
> barred, limited and/or excluded on the grounds that the alleged license
> at issue in this case and/or certain provisions contained therein are
> illegal, unconscionable and barred by public policy as well as by
> statutory and case law.
> =======================================================================
>
> This is not standard boilerplate language.

You might slap it on a boilerplate of something going to the scrapyard.
It's a silly and/or desperate defense.

-- 
David Kastrup