Re: Justice draws nigh

[David Kastrup]

RJack <user@example.net> writes:

> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>> On 5/13/2010 4:12 PM, RJack wrote:
>>> Why didn't you include the full context highlighted above?
>>
>> Because it is irrelevant. The portion I quoted demonstrates a court
>> saying that the registration of a copyright is a claim by the
>> registrant to ownership of his part in the work, and does not make
>> any statement with regards to ownership or lack of same by anyone
>> else. The extra portions you quote neither contribute to nor refute
>> this point, which is why I omitted them.
>>
>>> I am puzzled by your position. The defendants in Best Buy et. al.
>>> have denied Andersen's ownership of BusyBox. The burden is on
>>> Andersen to prove his ownership. What's your point? That the SFLC
>>> and Andersen are blithering idiots when they can't prove ownership
>>> of BusyBox?
>>
>> My position is that Erik Anderson is an owner of BusyBox, that his
>> registration of copyright in BusyBox is valid, and that the claims by
>> the defendants that Erik Anderson is not an owner of BusyBox are
>> incorrect.
>
> Claim away Hyman. There are bigger fools than you out there. The
> Birthers claim Obama was born in Kenya, Timbuktu and God knows
> where else.

Whereas you do your best to sound like you were born about 1in south
from what one would ordinarily assume.

-- 
David Kastrup