[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A GNU “social contract”?
From: |
Andy Wingo |
Subject: |
Re: A GNU “social contract”? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2019 22:35:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi :)
On Sat 09 Nov 2019 18:44, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 09:46:56PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Thanks, Andreas, for this new version! Some comments below.
>
> They are integrated into the attached new version. For good measure,
> I have capitalised "GNU System" as you did and thrown in a few italics
> as suggested.
>
> Andreas
I finally took a look and this document looks good to me. I guess a
next step would be to specifically elicit feedback from all GNU
stakeholders such as maintainers.
One nit, regarding the first line :) For me the document is essentially
a contract with each other, rather than to any abstract third party.
Even in the absence of a "broader free software community" with whom we
could profess a contract (and what would they agree to in return?), we
would be doing these things.
Andy
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Carlos O'Donell, 2019/12/10
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/12
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?,
Andy Wingo <=
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/17
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/19
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/19
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/23
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/12/27
- Re: A GNU “social contract”?, Mark Wielaard, 2019/12/27