[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed
From: |
Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss) |
Subject: |
Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Feb 2020 12:34:33 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Roundcube Webmail/0.9.2 |
On 2020-02-22 11:48, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Kaz Kylheku
(gnu-misc-discuss) wrote:
On 2020-02-22 01:22, Andreas Enge wrote:
> And another ad-hominem attack. Can you substantiate the claim of us
> being
> powermongers?
https://wiki.gnu.tools/wiki:code-of-conduct
"Enforcement", "Ban", "Correction", "Warning" ....
You are sick.
Could I kindly ask for this person to be put on moderation?
Actually, no you can't; however, you do have the option of asking for
this person to be put on moderation.
I find it
difficult to interpret the last statement as anything but a gratuitous
insult
(following a message that was not even directed at them).
People should mind their business and not fret about what is not
directed at them.
If anything, this message shows how much a code of conduct is needed.
Why, nothing better shows that a code of conduct is needed than
opposition to the code of conduct!
- Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alex Taylor, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Federico Leva (Nemo), 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss), 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Jean Louis, 2020/02/22
- Re: Why the "social contract" should not be endorsed, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/02/23
- Harrassment on this list, Andreas Enge, 2020/02/23