Re: question about historical GNU System releases

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   >    > GNU 0.3 has to be at least on par with the bumpiest
   >    > GNU/Linux distributions out there a couple of years.  "But
   >    > GNU 0.2 was even worse" isn't going to be accepted as
   >    > excuse.
   > 
   >    Bullshit. 0.3 is just that: 0.3. Anyone who puts expectations
   >    into a 0.3 release beyond surpassing 0.2, is a moron, and
   >    really deserves disappointment.
   > 
   > Michael is absolutley correct, if we are not up there with the
   > most bumpy GNU/Linux system then nobody will use GNU.

   And how does that got anything to do with making another alpha
   release?

0.3 isn't a alpha release.